Homebuilding Executives Need Focus on Existing-home Market

This article first appeared in the Homebuilding Executives Need Focus on Existing-home Market issue of Pro Builder.

The existing home market, with its 87 percent market share, is a better barometer to monitor home buying activity than the new home market. We expect that stabilization in sales volumes will be one of the first signs that individual markets are moving closer to recovery.

Sales Volumes

Figure 1 on page 10 shows how fast home buying activity has decelerated in Phoenix; Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif.; Washington D.C.; Las Vegas; and Orlando, Fla. Activity appears to have hit a plateau in Houston and Dallas.

At its peak in September 2005, the annual existing home sales volume topped 7.2 million sales nationally. The latest data shows that sales nationally have now dropped below 6 million, which is a decline of 17 percent. We believe the correction in sales volumes in 2006 was more severe than what the most commonly reported data suggests, based on analysis we have conducted, and the correction is not yet over.

Home Prices

Home prices adjust more quickly with new homes than resale homes, as there is more urgency among home builders to sell than there is among homeowners. However, there is no good local data for tracking real new-home prices. The data providers who collect this information miss incentives and other factors, and therefore the price appreciation rates in a tough market appear higher than they actually are. The best way to track new-home prices is to ask a sample of local executives what has happened in their communities over the last year.

Early to Peak

In markets like Orlando, Fla.; Riverside-San Bernardino (Southern California's Inland Empire); Phoenix; Las Vegas; and Washington, D.C., current annual resale volumes are approximately 40 percent less than at their peak levels during this cycle. Las Vegas peaked first in late 2004, while the other markets reached their highest sales volumes in mid- to late-2005. The resale volume in most of these markets has declined approximately 35 percent in just the last year alone, and the annual resale volumes are currently at the same level as mid-2002 in Orlando, Phoenix and Las Vegas. Each of these markets is showing only a slight year-over-year decline in resale prices, but further price decreases are expected.

Late to Peak

The resale markets in Dallas and Houston have held up well in the slowed national market and have just recently begun to show signs of slowing. The annual existing home sales volume peaked in January 2007 in Dallas and in February in Houston, making them among the last major housing markets in the country to witness declining sales. Volumes have declined less than 2 percent from earlier in the year.

What to Watch

Pay close attention to existing-home market conditions. Monitor resale activity and the volume of resale listings because they impact the health of your market. Existing-home sales volumes will begin to rise again soon in the markets where the corrections have been substantial and the economy remains strong.

I wouldn't pay much attention to published home prices these days. Instead, track the velocity of total sales in your price range in your submarket each month and do what you can to maximize your market's share of those home sales. HG

			EMPLOYMENT			AFFORDABILITY			PERMITS
		Short-Term Outlook/Grade	1-Year Payroll Employment Growth	1-Year Growth Rate	Unemployment Rate	Median Resale Home Price	Resale Housing Costs as % of Income*	Housing Cycle Barometer**	12-Month Single-Family Permits	1-Year Single-Family Growth	12-Month Total Permits	Total Permits as % of Peak Permits***
1	Houston		84,900	3.5%	3.8%	53,115	1%	70,527	94%	$148,700	26%	5.2
2	Atlanta		42,800	1.8%	4.0%	47,378	-23%	61,721	82%	$170,110	24%	3.7
3	Phoenix		78,400	4.2%	3.2%	35,530	-37%	44,545	64%	$263,000	41%	6.7
4	Riverside-San Bernardino		44,600	3.5%	5.0%	27,018	-41%	30,935	54%	$390,000	65%	9.3
5	Dallas		70,500	3.5%	3.9%	24,662	-23%	33,720	46%	$167,800	28%	5.2
6	Charlotte		19,300	2.4%	4.4%	19,452	-4%	23,892	95%	$167,250	27%	3.0
7	Chicago		33,700	0.9%	4.7%	19,062	-35%	35,963	77%	$250,000	39%	5.9
8	Orlando		29,500	2.7%	3.1%	19,054	-28%	27,183	75%	$245,000	41%	7.1
9	Las Vegas		26,200	2.9%	4.3%	17,485	-45%	25,448	58%	$305,975	50%	7.4
10	Austin		31,700	4.4%	3.2%	15,284	-20%	22,043	83%	$181,900	33%	5.3
11	Washington D.C.		46,900	2.0%	2.9%	14,389	-33%	20,331	54%	$408,945	49%	8.8
12	Nashville		11,100	1.5%	3.4%	13,458	-5%	15,033	82%	$155,000	27%	5.1
13	Fort Worth		21,900	2.6%	3.9%	13,425	-27%	18,309	48%	$117,100	21%	5.2
14	Raleigh-Cary		12,300	2.5%	3.4%	13,144	-8%	16,909	96%	$189,000	29%	3.7
15	Tampa		19,600	1.5%	3.3%	13,109	-51%	17,596	46%	$190,000	35%	6.2
16	San Antonio		20,200	2.5%	3.6%	12,443	-20%	17,354	74%	$145,700	29%	5.3
17	Denver		22,300	1.9%	3.5%	10,807	-38%	16,158	57%	$237,950	38%	5.7
18	Minneapolis		23,200	1.3%	4.2%	10,367	-37%	14,051	50%	$234,000	33%	6.2
19	Seattle		45,200	3.2%	3.6%	10,204	-18%	20,793	75%	$415,000	59%	10.0
20	Fort Myers		6,800	2.9%	3.3%	10,016	-53%	12,546	43%	$255,000	43%	6.5
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Census Bureau through the month ending April 2007; John Burns Real Estate Consulting. Data on all markets available at www.realestateconsulting.com *Proprietary affordability scale with 0 meaning most affordable time since 1983, 5 meaning median affordability, and 10 meaning least affordable time. Annual Mortgage Costs +1/7th of the downpayment divided by income. *** Peak activity since 1985.

Author Information

Chris Porter of John Burns Real Estate Consulting contributed to this report. John Burns helps many of the largest companies in the industry with strategy and monitoring market conditions. He can be reached at jburns@realestateconsulting.com.

PB Topical Ref

features