How to Decide Between ‘Would-Haves’ and ‘Could-Haves’ in the Design/Build Process

As housing costs rise to unprecedented highs, homebuyers are being forced to make concessions in order to afford home purchases, whether that means reducing square footage or sacrificing must-have home amenities. While some features can be added down the line once affordability improves, other design elements should be prioritized up front, according to Housing Design Matters.

Ceiling heights, for instance, cannot be changed once the house is complete, but while it’s still under construction, buyers should request a true cost analysis to review their options. Windows are another costly addition after construction is complete, but small features such as crown molding and kitchen finishes can be easily and affordably changed down the line.

I recently heard that some builders are offering post-construction services to help their homeowners deal with their could’ve/should’ve dilemmas. This is a great way to keep the builder/homeowner relationship going and breathe new life into the warranty team.

For many buyers, it may have been a financial restriction that created the could-have. For others, it is a process of discovery once they move into their home and realize the things they should have included. Yet another set of buyers have had changes to their family, making it necessary to change their homes.

Read more